- 01 Apr, 2024 2 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
for same reason as the xhtml_style version, there is no problem with having more than one listbox, see d2dedca3 (core: remove useless log in Base_callDialogMethod, 2020-07-03)
-
- 29 Mar, 2024 1 commit
-
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
- 27 Mar, 2024 5 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This makes consistent method resolution order with python3 and reveal a problem that relation field widgets render_pdf was not the expected one on python3, solve this by defining explicitly the method.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
roundDebitCredit does not raise in case of big difference since 696bc0d2 (2009-02-06 yo * Stop raising an exception, even if the credit is not equal to the debit in a built delivery, in the post processing script, because the builder may not blindly adopt prevision when updating existing lines, thus it can be unbalanced., 2009-02-06) This assertRaises syntax does nothing on python2 and was an error on python2. Update the test to test the actual behavior
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
- 26 Mar, 2024 4 commits
-
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
- 25 Mar, 2024 1 commit
-
-
Titouan Soulard authored
When trying to use `MemcachedTool` without the `python-memcached` package, a dummy implementation is supposed to allow installation while giving a warning when called. This dummy implementation was broken because it was calling a wrong class, named `_MemcachedTool`, which did not exist. Instead, `_MemcacheTool` did exist and was used for the real implementation. This commit renames `_MemcacheTool` to `_MemcachedTool` to allow dummy implementation to work.
-
- 21 Mar, 2024 3 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Fixes an logged error while indexing: 2024-03-07 23:44:21.997 WARNING CMFActivity Message dropped (no object found at path ('', 'erp5_portal_ec7d28d9ada99a2cad998125d59fc158', 'image_module', 'gadget_officejs_appstore_app_text_editor_icon_text_editor_png')) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/srv/slapgrid/slappart22/t/eje/soft/de456d85f70e1b1a086396326977c83c/parts/erp5/product/CMFActivity/ActivityTool.py", line 262, in getObject obj = self._getObject(activity_tool) File "/srv/slapgrid/slappart22/t/eje/soft/de456d85f70e1b1a086396326977c83c/parts/erp5/product/CMFActivity/ActivityTool.py", line 256, in _getObject obj = obj[id] File "/srv/slapgrid/slappart22/t/eje/soft/de456d85f70e1b1a086396326977c83c/eggs/Zope-4.8.9+slapospatched002-py2.7.egg/OFS/ObjectManager.py", line 843, in __getitem__ raise KeyError(key) KeyError: 'gadget_officejs_appstore_app_text_editor_icon_text_editor_png'
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
Workflows now are viable from ERP5 UI, so redirect to /view instead
-
Jérome Perrin authored
With python2, iterating on a dictionary or a set always produces the same result, although this is not a documented behavior. On python3 this is not the case, because the hashing algorithm is random by default, which can also be set using [`PYTHONHASHSEED`](https://docs.python.org/3/using/cmdline.html#envvar-PYTHONHASHSEED). On SlapOS, this is done with nexedi/slapos!1535 This fixes the parts where ERP5 code depends on python2 order, mostly tests, but also places where we iterate on a dictionary or set. Most of the time, the fix has been to sort so that the order is deterministic regardless of the hash algorithm randomization, but sometimes we had to extend a bit the configuration where the order was really important. We did this after discovering the problematic areas by running tests multiple times with different hash randomization seeds. It's not impossible that changing from "default python2 order" to "sorted" reveals some more problems in custom configurations, but this would mean that the configuration must be adjusted to use explicit order instead of being lucky with the default python2 order. The main pattern was the use of `edit` method which edits properties in an order that is a bit constrained with the `edit_order` mechanism, because some properties depend on other properties, so it's important to set them in order. This extends a bit the `edit_order` mechanism to specify more properties that were edited in the right order with `PYTHONHASHSEED=0` by chance. This also extends delivery builders to edit properties in order defined in the equivalence tester, most equivalence tester were already properly configured, except the `start_date` and `stop_date` from delivery level movement groups. That probably only matters for some specific test assertions, but in practice this was visible in a lot of failing tests. Some visible changes are that: - workflows are now sorted alphabetically on history tab - properties are now sorted alphabetically on the diff view of history tab - business templates are installed in the order of dependencies and in alphabetic order when they are not constrained. See merge request nexedi/erp5!1882
-
- 19 Mar, 2024 13 commits
-
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
Remove forbidden properties when retrieve the properties from the schema. - template and options isn't part of json schema spec, so it isn't possible to use this feature globally. - template also could be used to call callbacks, so despite we block unsafe-eval, it still better remove it. - both were removed because it can lead to parameter injection, where by saving the form w/o editing anything, it changes the parameters, it adds non-visible values, which can up to some extend be a security risk. Update the description to display the "default" value as a hint, if it was provided into the schema.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
constructs like `portal_catalog(title=d.keys())` were allowed on python2, we can allow them on python3 as well.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
See discussion in https://www.erp5.com/group_section/forum/Worklists-with-security-uid-columns-wa7gzLN6NG See merge request nexedi/erp5!1712
-
Georgios Dagkakis authored
-
Georgios Dagkakis authored
-
Georgios Dagkakis authored
-
Georgios Dagkakis authored
-
Georgios Dagkakis authored
-
Klaus Wölfel authored
With some combinations of worklists using two additional security_uid columns coming from local role groups, some documents might be excluded from worklists, without the fix, when running with a random PYTHONHASHSEED, the test can fail with: FAIL: test_worklist_exclusionlist_collision (erp5.component.test.erp5_version.testERP5CatalogSecurityUidOptimization.TestSecurityUidOptimizationWorklist) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "<portal_components/test.erp5.testERP5CatalogSecurityUidOptimization>", line 370, in test_worklist_exclusionlist_collision 'security_uid_or_alternate_security_uid_draft': 1, File "<portal_components/test.erp5.testERP5CatalogSecurityUidOptimization>", line 213, in assertWorklistCount expected_count_by_worklist_id, AssertionError: {'security_uid_or_alternate_security_uid_draft': 1} != {'collision_worklist': 1, 'security_uid_or_alternate_security_uid_draft': 1} - {'security_uid_or_alternate_security_uid_draft': 1} + {'collision_worklist': 1, 'security_uid_or_alternate_security_uid_draft': 1} ? +++++++++++++++++++++++++ What happens in sumCatalogResultByWorklist is something like this: (Pdb) pp criterion_dict {'alternate_security_uid': <ExclusionList [11, 14]>, 'other_security_uid': frozenset([13L]), 'portal_type': frozenset(['Person']), 'validation_state': frozenset(['draft'])} (Pdb) pp catalog_result.dictionaries() [{'alternate_security_uid': 12, 'count': Decimal('1'), 'other_security_uid': 13, 'portal_type': 'Person', 'validation_state': 'draft'}] Depending on the worklists grouped together in grouped_worklist_dict and the order this dict is iterated, we may reach a situation where criterion_id_list contains 'alternate_security_uid', because for another worklist it was not an ExclusionList but a list to be applied, in this case, this if condition is false: for criterion_id in criterion_id_list: criterion_value_set = criterion_dict[criterion_id] if result_line[criterion_id] not in criterion_value_set: is_candidate = False and the row is not counted in collision_worklist worklist. Co-authored-by: Jérome Perrin <jerome@nexedi.com>
-
Jérome Perrin authored
These are printed like a normal list, so it's a bit hard to figure out if they are supposed to be excluded when debugging
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This refactors security_uid_innodb_catalog test to have the config in a test business template and include a workflow with some worklists. This also depends on erp5_worklist_sql, to test worklists when a combination of erp5_security_uid_innodb_catalog and erp5_worklist_sql are enabled, which a common situation.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Otherwise we get an error when just adding a worklist
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
See merge request nexedi/erp5!1900
-
- 18 Mar, 2024 7 commits
-
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
This business template introduces a way to adjust mariadb and data.fs after restore from backup. In the occasion that the backups are unsync (which is normal) it helps to push both on sync instead of fully reindex the site.
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
See merge request nexedi/erp5!1904
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
Select sets "1" and "" as values
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
The select must display the value regardless if it is the proper type or not, so we patch setValue to include the value even it is not present on enum (instead drop the value). Typecast patch was extended to not modify the data only convert to proper type if possible, otherwise, keep the wrong value. The goal is allow the user see the wrong value with the error message.
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
-
- 13 Mar, 2024 4 commits
-
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
See merge request nexedi/erp5!1902
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
by using str on a dict we don't produce consistent results depending on hash randomization. This was visible with erp5_core_test:testCacheTool and PYTHONHASHSEED 12 , the cache id generated in https://lab.nexedi.com/nexedi/erp5/-/blob/a0aa9184d/bt5/erp5_core_test/TestTemplateItem/portal_components/test.erp5.testCacheTool.py#L216-218 was "('py_script_obj', (60000,), {'result': 'a short value', 'portal_path': ('', 'erp5')})" and the cache id generated in https://lab.nexedi.com/nexedi/erp5/-/blob/a0aa9184d/bt5/erp5_core_test/TestTemplateItem/portal_components/test.erp5.testCacheTool.py#L239-241 with same arguments for delete was "('py_script_obj', (60000,), {'portal_path': ('', 'erp5'), 'result': 'a short value'})")
-