- 01 Sep, 2020 5 commits
-
-
Ludovic Kiefer authored
-
Ludovic Kiefer authored
-
Ludovic Kiefer authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
See jio@24b938cb
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
- 31 Aug, 2020 8 commits
-
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
Should fix most of the cases where reloading components cause breakage. There is still a race condition between a transaction's cache being actually flushed (which can only happen at transaction boundaries) and another transaction doing the actual class reload, which will immediately affect all the started transactions in the same process.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Once a portal type class became available again, instances of this classes should no longer be broken and can be modified again
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Some other types (Gadget Type) are currently lacking the interaction workflow which resets the dynamic classes.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Persons created before the introduction of ERP5 Login and user_id will only have a user_id after migration if they were already user before migration, otherwise they will not have a user_id and creating assignments and ERP5 Login for this person creates a user which can not log in the system. To make it possible for these persons to login anyway, we ensure person has a user id when validating a login
-
Jérome Perrin authored
while setting an initial user id should be allowed for any user which can create a person, changing an already set user id can have security implications, so we protect it with a more strict permission
-
Jérome Perrin authored
user_id are technical things that should not be displayed to users. In the case of tokens, for now we show "something that's not user id / not the token secret". That's not ideal but as far as I know whe don't really have use cases of tokens to show a page where user caption would be displayed.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Person.setUserId is heavy, it serializes person module to prevent concurrency, but in some cases we the risk of having duplicate user ids is under control, so we don't want to pay the performance price. See merge request nexedi/erp5!1242
-
- 27 Aug, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
-
- 26 Aug, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Gabriel Monnerat authored
-
- 25 Aug, 2020 3 commits
-
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
-
- 24 Aug, 2020 4 commits
-
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
- 21 Aug, 2020 5 commits
-
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
- 19 Aug, 2020 8 commits
-
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
See merge request nexedi/erp5!1243
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
padding too much in buttom make header bigger, so when export to pdf, header is cut off to hit heigth which make logo display at top
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
- 18 Aug, 2020 2 commits
-
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
also needs to be declared in hidden content types to prevent adding directly in preferences
-
- 17 Aug, 2020 3 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This activity is spawned on all nodes, which cause too many conflicts. We can take the risk here, assuming that references were already OK before migration.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Person.setUserId does expensive checks to ensure that user ids are uniques, but the default id generator already guarantees unicity, so when default id generator is used we don't need Person.setUserId unicity checks. Now when generating user ids, we only consider user id conflict with existing users, because it's not so expensive and might still happen, for example if user ids have been migrated from person references when erp5_users PAS plugin was used. person.setUserId still performs the expensive checks to prevent duplications against other transactions using person.setUserId, but not against other transactions using person.initUserId
-
Jérome Perrin authored
should be same for cases where type based method is a python script, but is a bit more explicit/safe and consistent with other usages.
-