- 17 Mar, 2022 4 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
For now only checks that error_message is missing, but later we might extended this to perform more check on the workflow definition.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
After df85ef46 (ERP5Workflow: DC Workflows are now ERP5 objects (!1378)., 2020-11-18) we increased the expected value from 24 to 36, because it was just different with new workflow implementation and what was important is to have large buckets. After that, the test was flaky and eventually we changed the assertion from checking that the value equal the expected value to checking that it's larger to checking that it's larger to a satisfying value and we used the initial 24 for satisfying value. A large value here means the bucket contain many items, which happens when the pickle size is small We now understand that pickle are short when the pickler was able to deduplicate some strings because they were the same instances (as compared by `is` operator). Note that this deduplication happens before the one operated by Products.ERP5Type.Workflow.dedupStrings after bucket rotation, it's the "normal" deduplication from pickle happening when element are added to list. Because it's a good thing for disk usage to have small pickles, we raise our expectation and increase the expected minimal value to be 30.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Because error_message variable was missing in component_validation_workflow, once the validation was refused for an error, every subsequent entry in workflow history was carrying the same error message. Adding the missing variable fix this, but it would cause diff every time we modify and re-export a component, so we also take care of not exporting it in business template, like we already did for other several variables.
-
- 11 Mar, 2022 2 commits
-
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
- 10 Mar, 2022 5 commits
-
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
Avoid repeating processing_node condition for every single activity whose serialization_tag dependency is being checked. This reduces the length and execution complexity of produced SQL.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
The meaning of empty items for **multi** list fields for categories is not clear for dialogs (if user does not want to apply any filter, then the natural way would be to select nothing). This also caused issues with category fields, when the action script uses restrictedTraverse to get the uids corresponding to the category but a path is empty, like for example in https://lab.nexedi.com/nexedi/erp5/blob/d51bb0413a806b3db0c5eb69dec06065b9601322/bt5/erp5_accounting/SkinTemplateItem/portal_skins/erp5_accounting/AccountModule_getTrialBalanceReportSectionList.py#L40-48 which does this: ```python # optional GAP filter node_uid = [] gap_uid_list = [] for gap in request.get('gap_list', ()): gap_uid_list.append(portal.portal_categories.gap.restrictedTraverse(gap).getUid()) if gap_uid_list: node_uid = [x.uid for x in portal.portal_catalog( portal_type='Account', default_gap_uid=gap_uid_list)] or -1 ``` If an empty item is selected, then `gap_uid_list` will contain an entry for `portal.portal_categories.gap.restrictedTraverse('').getUid()` which will be the uid of the gap base category. Searching with a base category uid nowadays does not match any document, but before 95e3eaec (CMFCategory: Do not index any Base Category as a related document., 2016-12-21), it was matching all documents having a relation from this base category and in the case of this trial balance report it was matching all accounts. This was a problem for old instances with accounts created before 95e3eaec, because when they were first indexed, they had the record in category table, so they were matched, but once they get re-indexed, they no longer had the record, so the result of this report when selecting the empty item became different, because accounts were no longer included. Looking back at this, maybe when updating to get 95e3eaec, we should have ran a migration to delete all these records (re-indexing every document in the background should be enough) so that if there's a problem, the problem happens right now and not after a few months after accounts are modified and re-indexed. When looking at this from end user level, theses empty items not only cause this problem, but also does not have a clear behaviour and are not needed, so the changes here are about removing these empty items. In accounting reports, there was a multi listfield showing all gap categories, "grouped" by chart of account - but the name of the chart of account was not displayed. This change to use a None item, which is rendered as disabled to display the chart of account name, but to do this we had to fix a bug in Formulator, these disabled items were only working properly for single item widgets, not multiple items widgets. See merge request nexedi/erp5!1572
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This addresses a regression from !1561 changing the class hierarchy caused Login to loose its docstring and became no longer publishable. This was problematic because it was not detected by the test suite, so HTML test is changed to use zope publication instead of calling the view on the context. Another notable point is that this behaves differently in ERP5JS, the Logins were still visible in ERP5JS. Because we don't actually rely on "no docstring on the class" to prevent publication, this is not changed. See merge request !1571
-
Jérome Perrin authored
There was opening and closing tags mismatch: <div><a href="#references1_anchor">References</div></a>
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This seems to be used only in Localizer's ZMI. This is not compatible with newer version of DocumentTemplate, but because we don't use, it's better to remove the functionality
-
- 08 Mar, 2022 8 commits
-
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
In order to stabilise UI tests which are waiting for the loading animation to play during language change. Pick a small delay so users should not notice (value suggested by Romain).
-
Gabriel Monnerat authored
When we have more than one language and many documents with same reference but with different language, the first impression is that we have many duplicated documents. Display the language, we can easily detect that we have same reference to different languages.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
While in a "single" list field, we need an empty item that will be selected by default, there's no such need on a multi list field. These empty items also have the problem that their meaning is not really clear.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Instead of having empty string items which for which the meaning is not really clear.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
processing_node -3 is not automatically used anymore, such failure would nowadays be a processing_node of -2. So simplify this comment.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
For example, an immediateReindexObject and a SQLCatalog_deferFullTextIndexActivity may be spawned.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
Without this, more categories than can be displayed in the dropdown menu may match, pushing expected "Quantity" one out of the list, causing the test to fail.
-
- 07 Mar, 2022 7 commits
-
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This is more realistic, because a real HTTP request will use ZPublisher.BaseRequest.BaseRequest.traverse, which has slightly different behaviour than getting the form on the context of document. The behavior becomes different for documents which do some logic on traversal (like for example the web sites changing the skin).
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This was breaking for cases where values contained characters used for markup such as <> or & and also for the special case of None which is used to render disabled items.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Zope only publish objects if they have a docstring. The change in class hierarchy from b7a60478 (ERP5Security,erp5: simplify EncryptedPasswordMixin.setPassword, 2022-02-21) caused that Login and subclasses no longer have a docstring and as a result there were no longer publishable by Zope, so it was not possible to view them in xhtml style. ERP5JS was not affected, because it does not directly rely on Zope publication APIs.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
We don't want to use wildcard in core business template, because when another business template extend these paths with new documents, the new documents are included in erp5_core. This also cause issues for tests creating dummy content in these paths.
-
- 03 Mar, 2022 4 commits
-
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
This was still working with Zope 2.13 because the default output_encoding for HTML was iso-8859-15 but this is not the case anymore with Zope 4. Moreover this should be explicit rather than implicit anyway...
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
Revert "testBusinessTemplateTwoFileExport: Make output_encoding explicit as it should have always been." This reverts commit 968991e7 which does not actually work properly with Zope4.
-
Yusei Tahara authored
-
Yusei Tahara authored
SQLCatalog_trimInventoryCacheOnCatalog needs resource category on movement.
-
- 02 Mar, 2022 1 commit
-
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
- 28 Feb, 2022 2 commits
-
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
This fixes a failure due to Zope4 now defaulting to utf-8.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Use `portal_alarms/check_consistency` after configuration to make sure that every document created by configurator or part of the dependency business template is valid. For now we have two exceptions (that are some TODO for the future): - Web Sites, because upgrader constraints are not ran by configurator at this point - Business Configuration, because most of the configurator item classes don't fully follow the protocol of constraints, their `fixConsistency` method always return "something needs to be fixed" without actually checking. See merge request !1562
-
- 24 Feb, 2022 7 commits
-
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
Creation date is defined as the oldest date of any workflow history on the considered document. Modification date is defined as the newest date of any workflow history on the considered document. As soon as there is more than one workflow on a given document, these values can differ: they are set with the wall-clock time at the moment the workflow history of each workflow is initially filled, so one can land just before a second change and the other right after. So comparing them is meaningless, catalog or not, and just causes this test to be unstable.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Because we want to check consistency on all documents created by configurator, we also need documents created during the test to be consistent (or deleted)
-
Jérome Perrin authored
We had trade phase duplication: - `trade_phase/default/*` were provided by erp5_simulation_test - `trade_phase/trade/*` are provided by erp5_configurator_standard_categories so the former was only for testing and the later were actually used in instance configured by configurator. But in some paths from configurator_standard_*template, which are also used on configurated instances, were using trade_phase/default (the one from test). Some rules were referencing these categories, but apparenlty not using them. To fix this confusion, use trade_phase/trade/* everywhere, and install erp5_configurator_standard_categories where needed in tests.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
BusinessConfiguration have a resource category, but it's the workflow, it's not really a resource, so some APIs from the base Amount class are not available. Because they have no meaning on BusinessConfiguration anyway, define the broken APIs to return nothing. This fixes errors trying to use check_consistency alarm on Business Configurations.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-