git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35507 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

The oood after high usage, deletes the openoffice pidfile and it tries to start a new openoffice while the current one is busy. This makes oood "lost" the openoffice pid file and after been stopped by supervisor the openoffice is not stopped.

This changes make sure the open office will be stopped after shutdown.



git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35506 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

* Add a new action Reset Prices into Sale Order, Sale Packing List, Purchase Order, and Purchase Packing List.

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35505 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

 - erp5_ingestion is required, because portal_contributions is used by OOoDocument.py to create one Image.
 - erp5_dms is required because Image portal type is Required for create one temporary image document.
 - erp5_web is a dependency of erp5_dms.



git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35504 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

According to portal_contributions API a file and file_name should be provided to create a new document.



git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35503 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35502 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35501 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35500 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35499 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35498 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35497 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35496 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

The fix is probably easy, the tests are just failing because they make
assertions on sequence.get('applied_rule'), but in new simulation this applied
rule is the simulation root applied rule and those assertions will have to be
done on the level below.


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35495 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35494 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

was checked on, the UI looked modifiable, and there was no difference in whether
it was possible or not. And, when you changed a value which was delegated, the UI
reports that the change was successful, but in reality the change was discarded.
This interface was horribly confusing. In this commit, I use javascript to add
the attribute readonly in case the checkbox is checked. This makes not possible to
modify a field if the checkbox is checked, in this way, we should be able to
avoid mistakes like before.

I try it on browser with javascript disable and the behaviour is exacly like
before, so this improvement benefit only to those who have javascript enable on
their web browsers.


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35493 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35492 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

that's why we observed strange behaviours in field validation and in proxyfield
caches.


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35491 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

use INSTANCE_HOME environment variable, which is always set by either runUnitTest.py or zopectl. Also warn when previous dump is not found

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35490 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35489 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

* Movement_getPriceCalculationOperandDict must take into account delivery types when getting Trade Conditions.

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35488 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

* fix last proxyfication problems in erp5_trade

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35487 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

* add new field my_planning_box in order to replace planning_box

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35485 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35484 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35483 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35482 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35481 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

Fix 35479 is not enough to refresh subdocuments


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35480 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

Related to test_owner_local_role_on_clone


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35479 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

* finish to proxy SaleOrder_viewSaleOrderFastInputDialog
* rename two fields because field id should not use method names

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35478 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35476 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35475 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35474 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

the condition changable. This fixes a bug tested on
test_tradeModelLineWithEmptyBaseContributionMovement.
Override the condition in PaymentCondition and make PaymentCondition
appliable to any movements.


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35473 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35472 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

Fixes test testTradeCondition.test_subcontent_supply_line_reindexing


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35471 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35470 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

The test is supposed to fail, as the proxy field cache does not check the skin
selection. A transaction commit was missing to reproduce the issue.


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35469 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

have time to investigate more now, sorry.


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35468 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35467 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@35466 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de