- 31 Mar, 2023 7 commits
-
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
If the user wants actitivites, it should create multiples StandardBT5ConfiguratorItems, This should accellerate Tests based on ERP5Configurator. This should be recoded, but it should speed up bootstrap of a site, as get modified objects are not called.
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
Without this (on slapos master ui) the redirection places value unquoted causing parser to fail later on when resolve {n.me}
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
Returning true allows to add movements to existing one, and this group shall always separate them.
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Alain Takoudjou authored
If 2 lines have the same effective date (catalog has a 1 second precision), always return the validate and open first. Commit: 02d06501 Changes applied from history: http://git.erp5.org/gitweb/erp5.git/history/refs/heads/interaction-drop:/product/ERP5/Document/SubscriptionItem.py?js=1
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
Original commit from : Lukasz Nowak <luke@nexedi.com> 3e45ec35
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
- 29 Mar, 2023 1 commit
-
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
See merge request !1763
-
- 28 Mar, 2023 3 commits
-
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
XLTE(*) follows the same top-level packaging structure like wendelin.core does. Registration is done via new `register_xpkg` function instead of just loop so that pkgname argument is properly captured in created lambda and does not change after going to next iteration. (*) https://lab.nexedi.com/kirr/xlte /reviewed-by @jerome /reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!1762
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
In 5796a17a (core_test: Add test to make sure that wendelin.core basically works) I added wendelin_transform to pylint so that the checker could recognize wendelin.core's special wendelin top-level module/package and handle ok from wendelin.bigarray.array_zodb import ZBigArray this works, but e.g. for plain import wendelin or from wendelin import bigarray pylint currenly fails with AssertionError: explicit relative import, but no context_file? To better see what is going on let's conside the following test program """ZZZ""" from wendelin.bigarray.array_zodb import ZBigArray from wendelin import bigarray def main(): """main""" _ = ZBigArray and run pylint on it. Here is what it gives: wendelin_transform Module(wendelin) -> Module() visit_from From() basename: wendelin.bigarray.array_zodb names: [('ZBigArray', None)] modnode: Module(test) get_imported_module From() wendelin.bigarray.array_zodb importedmodnode: Module(wendelin.bigarray.array_zodb) ('_add_imported_module', <From() l.3 [test] at 0x7ff214b4cb90>, 'wendelin.bigarray.array_zodb.ZBigArray') wendelin_transform Module(wendelin) -> Module() visit_from From() basename: wendelin names: [('bigarray', None)] modnode: Module(test) get_imported_module From() wendelin wendelin_transform Module(wendelin) -> Module() importedmodnode: Module() ************* Module test W: 4, 0: Relative import 'wendelin', should be '' (relative-import) ('_add_imported_module', <From() l.4 [test] at 0x7ff214b4cf50>, '.bigarray') Traceback (most recent call last): File "./x.py", line 22, in <module> Run(['test.py', '--reports=n'], exit=False) File "/home/kirr/src/tools/py/pylint/pylint/lint.py", line 1332, in __init__ linter.check(args) File "/home/kirr/src/tools/py/pylint/pylint/lint.py", line 747, in check self._do_check(files_or_modules) File "/home/kirr/src/tools/py/pylint/pylint/lint.py", line 869, in _do_check self.check_astroid_module(ast_node, walker, rawcheckers, tokencheckers) File "/home/kirr/src/tools/py/pylint/pylint/lint.py", line 946, in check_astroid_module walker.walk(ast_node) File "/home/kirr/src/tools/py/pylint/pylint/utils.py", line 874, in walk self.walk(child) File "/home/kirr/src/tools/py/pylint/pylint/utils.py", line 871, in walk cb(astroid) File "/home/kirr/src/tools/py/pylint/pylint/checkers/imports.py", line 288, in visit_from self._add_imported_module(node, '%s.%s' % (importedmodnode.name, name)) File "/home/kirr/src/tools/py/pylint/pylint/checkers/imports.py", line 328, in _add_imported_module importedmodname = get_module_part(importedmodname) File "/home/kirr/src/tools/py/astroid/astroid/modutils.py", line 359, in get_module_part 'explicit relative import, but no context_file?' AssertionError: explicit relative import, but no context_file? we see that the line from wendelin.bigarray.array_zodb import ZBigArray corresponds to ('_add_imported_module', <From() l.3 [test] at 0x7ff214b4cb90>, 'wendelin.bigarray.array_zodb.ZBigArray') and the line from wendelin import bigarray corresponds to ('_add_imported_module', <From() l.4 [test] at 0x7ff214b4cf50>, '.bigarray') notice that in the latter case there is no 'wendelin' prefix and the import goes as just '.bigarray' instead of 'wendelin.bigarray' which leads to further crash in get_module_part. -> Fix it by initializing wendelin module yielded by wendelin_transform with .name set. Not sure why it is working longer imports without that. Without the fix added test breaks as .../instance/slappart5/bin$ ./runUnitTest -v -v -v testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent ... Running Unit tests of <class 'testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent'> ok testImportVersionedComponentOnly (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent) ... ok testInvalidId (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent) ... ok testInvalidSourceCode (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent) ... ok testModuleSecurityInfo (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent) ... ok testPylint (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent) ... FAIL testPylintAstroidModuleGeneratedOnce (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent) ... ok testPylintNamedtupleUnicodeLiteralsRegression (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent) ... ok testReferenceWithReservedKeywords (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent) ... ok testValidateInvalidateDelete (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent) ... ok testVersionPriority (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent) ... ok testVersionWithReservedKeywords (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent) ... ok testWorkflowErrorMessage (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent) Check that validation error messages are stored in workflow ... ok ====================================================================== FAIL: testPylint (testDynamicClassGeneration.TestZodbModuleComponent) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File ".../parts/erp5/Products/ERP5Type/tests/testDynamicClassGeneration.py", line 2347, in testPylint component.checkSourceCode() File ".../parts/erp5/product/ERP5Type/mixin/component.py", line 329, in checkSourceCode return checkPythonSourceCode(self.getTextContent(), self.getPortalType()) File ".../parts/erp5/product/ERP5Type/Utils.py", line 540, in checkPythonSourceCode Run(args, reporter=TextReporter(output_file), exit=False) File ".../develop-eggs/pylint-1.4.4+slapospatched002-py2.7.egg/pylint/lint.py", line 1332, in __init__ linter.check(args) File ".../develop-eggs/pylint-1.4.4+slapospatched002-py2.7.egg/pylint/lint.py", line 747, in check self._do_check(files_or_modules) File ".../develop-eggs/pylint-1.4.4+slapospatched002-py2.7.egg/pylint/lint.py", line 869, in _do_check self.check_astroid_module(ast_node, walker, rawcheckers, tokencheckers) File ".../develop-eggs/pylint-1.4.4+slapospatched002-py2.7.egg/pylint/lint.py", line 946, in check_astroid_module walker.walk(ast_node) File ".../develop-eggs/pylint-1.4.4+slapospatched002-py2.7.egg/pylint/utils.py", line 874, in walk self.walk(child) File ".../develop-eggs/pylint-1.4.4+slapospatched002-py2.7.egg/pylint/utils.py", line 871, in walk cb(astroid) File ".../develop-eggs/pylint-1.4.4+slapospatched002-py2.7.egg/pylint/checkers/imports.py", line 253, in visit_import self._add_imported_module(node, importedmodnode.name) File ".../develop-eggs/pylint-1.4.4+slapospatched002-py2.7.egg/pylint/checkers/imports.py", line 319, in _add_imported_module importedmodname = get_module_part(importedmodname) File ".../develop-eggs/astroid-1.3.8+slapospatched001-py2.7.egg/astroid/modutils.py", line 359, in get_module_part 'explicit relative import, but no context_file?' AssertionError: explicit relative import, but no context_file? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 13 tests in 137.609s FAILED (failures=1) /helped-and-reviewed-by @jerome /reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!1762
-
- 27 Mar, 2023 1 commit
-
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
See merge request nexedi/erp5!1759
-
- 25 Mar, 2023 1 commit
-
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
See merge request nexedi/erp5!1538
-
- 24 Mar, 2023 12 commits
-
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
On the automatic upgrade some bt5 (erp5_core) can be upgraded before erp5_property_sheets. Since, it isnt a problem if this happens if no Mixin configuration is present, it is better directly check the existence of the property on the bt5. In general we expect that erp5_property_sheets is upgraded before any other bt5 with TypeMixin definition.
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
Use the proper way to include Mixin into a portal type
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
Use the proper way to include Mixin into a portal type
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
This value isnt exported anymore
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
Handle type_mixin like property_sheets and use Business Template properly
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
Allow the developer associate a Mixin on Business template level without require to overwrite the portal type itself Include mixins can be done in the same way, allowed content types or property sheets are set.
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
After updating Products.CMFCore we had issues on sites where URLTool was registered as ISiteRoot. In the case of ERP5, we don't really need portal_url.getPortalObject(), this changes to use ERP5Site.getPortalObject(), while at the same time doing something so that portal_url.getPortalObject() also works. See https://github.com/zopefoundation/Products.CMFCore/pull/126 for more details See merge request nexedi/erp5!1758
-
Jérome Perrin authored
this is a "magic" local variable used to add more debugging information in zope traceback, it's not supposed to be used directly so it was a false positive in our case. This extends the default value of --dummy-variable-rgx that was defined to _$|dummy in pylint 1.4.4 ( https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/blob/pylint-1.4.4/pylint/checkers/variables.py#L296 )
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This can happen when request is used as a cache storage, especially after eab00f14 (deferred_style: Properly keep request parameters, 2021-03-10)
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
that it was created.
-
- 22 Mar, 2023 1 commit
-
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
squash me
-
- 21 Mar, 2023 1 commit
-
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
This allow during a subscription process, create a user and them create all documents using that user w/o rely on proxy roles (keeping good ownership across the documents).
-
- 20 Mar, 2023 11 commits
-
-
Rafael Monnerat authored
See merge request nexedi/erp5!1756
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Products.CMFCore's version 2.7.0 of portal_url.getPortalObject returns the portal in an incomplete acquisition context, which causes issues when the site is registered as ISiteRoot utility (the typical error being AttributeError REQUEST) ERP5Site.getPortalObject works just fine and is used in many places, this commit replaces all occurences of portal_url.getPortalObject by getPortalObject.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
and adjust the test for better python3 compatibility
-
Jérome Perrin authored
we don't use these
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This TALES is complex, especially if we need to support python3 as well
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Some old ERP5 site were registered as ISiteRoot and this cause issues with Products.CMFCore update 2.2.10 -> 2.7
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
this interaction adjust membership criterions when variation categories is changed, but we don't really need security restriction in the interaction, because security is already checked when setting variation categories.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This factorize code and fix a problem that when the variation category was a Category from the same variation base category, we had the base category twice ( something like group/group/nexedi )
-
Jérome Perrin authored
We have been using scripts returning categories but it was missing in the relation field.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
otherwise it is acquired from BudgetLine, which is bad because: - the value of catalog.has_cell_content will be wrong - hasCellContent is slow and this was called for all cells in a budget line
-
- 19 Mar, 2023 2 commits
-
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
/reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!1757
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
In 79fa584e we moved some security definition from wendelin to erp5, but we didn't add any tests anywhere. Recent project based tests revealed that this migration actually failed [1]. We should therefore add a test for this. [1] wendelin@f8678468 (comment 181134) /reviewed-on !1757
-