1. 17 Apr, 2018 4 commits
  2. 16 Apr, 2018 1 commit
  3. 15 Apr, 2018 12 commits
  4. 12 Apr, 2018 3 commits
  5. 10 Apr, 2018 3 commits
  6. 09 Apr, 2018 1 commit
  7. 06 Apr, 2018 8 commits
  8. 05 Apr, 2018 1 commit
    • Julien Muchembled's avatar
      ERP5Form: when editing a FormBox, do not compute the context twice (and wrongly) · ab388d7f
      Julien Muchembled authored
      This first reverts the following 2 commits:
        566c0c5f
        3a08c758
      
      to at least fix the issue that the context method takes 2 arguments that aren't
      available from FormBoxEditor.edit() without slowing things even more.
      
      About deferred style, widget editor objects can be ignored for the moment. If
      we ever need to restore fully functional objects, the regression in commit
        a5a2f1cd
      could be solved with the following patch:
      
      --- a/product/ERP5Form/FormBox.py
      +++ b/product/ERP5Form/FormBox.py
      @@ -131,22 +131,32 @@ def render(self, field, key, value, REQUEST, render_prefix=None):
       class FormBoxEditor:
         """An editor returned from FormBox validation able to `edit` document."""
       
      +  path = None
      +
         def __init__(self, result, context):
           """Initialize with all necessary information for editing.
       
           Keep a reference to the correct context and don't expect the caller to provide it
           during the edit phase because they don't have access to the widget anymore.
           """
           self.attr_dict, self.editor_list = result
      +    self.context = context
           self.edit = lambda _: self._edit(context)
       
         def __getstate__(self):
      -    pass
      +    return (self.attr_dict, self.editor_list,
      +            self.path or self.context.getPhysicalPath())
      +
      +  def __setstate__(self, state):
      +    self.attr_dict, self.editor_list, self.path = state
       
         def __call__(self, REQUEST):
           # Called by Base_edit in case of FormValidationError
           pass
       
      +  def edit(self, context):
      +    return self._edit(context.unrestrictedTraverse(self.path))
      +
         def _edit(self, context):
           """Edit inside correct context."""
           context.edit(**self.attr_dict)
      
      This commit also removes the unused view() method on editors.
      
      /reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!622
      ab388d7f
  9. 04 Apr, 2018 7 commits
    • Vincent Bechu's avatar
      [erp5_core] Jio Release 3.28.0 · a0a543f8
      Vincent Bechu authored
      /reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!626
      a0a543f8
    • Vincent Bechu's avatar
      [erp5_web_renderjs_ui] Jio Release 3.28.0 · 99ca7eed
      Vincent Bechu authored
      /reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!625
      99ca7eed
    • Jérome Perrin's avatar
      testFunctionalAnonymousSelection: add missing dependency · 65d4019b
      Jérome Perrin authored
      erp5_l10n_fa is needed to test the RTL direction.
      
      same as b6eec549
      65d4019b
    • Jérome Perrin's avatar
      Merge !496 Replace \r\n by \n in ZSQL Methods' arguments · aa603a2c
      Jérome Perrin authored
      Since 76cc938e we have diffs each time we edit ZSQL Methods. This is a "big commit" to change all remaining ZSQL methods. I checked diffs one by one, but I would appreciate others check this as well and confirm that it's OK to do so.
      
      From the root of repository, I did :
      
      ```
      grep -rl Products.ZSQLMethods.SQL  . | grep '\.xml$' | xargs ~/bin/zsql_backslash_n.py
      ```
      
      With a script containing
      ```python
      
      from lxml import etree
      import sys
      
      for filename in sys.argv[1:]:
        with open(filename) as f:
          tree = etree.parse(f)
          root = tree.getroot()
          for el in tree.xpath('//item/key/string[text() = "arguments_src"]/../../value/string'):
            if el.text:
              el.text = el.text.replace(r'\r\n', r'\n')
      
          # force <string> element to have a text, so that they export as <string></string> and not <string/>
          for el in tree.xpath('//string[not(text())]'):
            el.text = ''
      
        with open(filename, 'w') as f:
          f.write(
              '<?xml version="1.0"?>\n'
              + etree.tostring(root, pretty_print=True, encoding="utf-8"))
      
        print filename
      ```
      ( script snippet: nexedi/erp5$277 )
      
      /cc @jm @georgios.dagkakis @Nicolas
      
      /reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!496
      
      Conflicts:
      	product/ERP5/bootstrap/erp5_mysql_innodb_catalog/CatalogMethodTemplateItem/portal_catalog/erp5_mysql_innodb/z_getitem_by_path.xml
      	product/ERP5/bootstrap/erp5_mysql_innodb_catalog/CatalogMethodTemplateItem/portal_catalog/erp5_mysql_innodb/z_getitem_by_uid.xml
      	product/ERP5/bootstrap/erp5_mysql_innodb_catalog/CatalogMethodTemplateItem/portal_catalog/erp5_mysql_innodb/z_produce_reserved_uid_list.xml
      aa603a2c
    • Jérome Perrin's avatar
      Merge !504 Do not save documents when there are pending activities · 16de28d5
      Jérome Perrin authored
      When document has pending activities, we refuse changing ID ( because there might be pending `updateRelatedContent` activities if I remember correctly ), but it's done in a way that breaks the "atomic" aspect of the transaction a bit, because we
      
      As a result, this happens sometimes that not all properties user changed are modified. In the example below, the change to *Include Documents in Site Map* is not saved (and also change to *ID*):
      
      ![erp5-sorryPendingActivitiesSavePartially](/uploads/ff4bfd6ad0e8a42ba3684cccdc450e21/erp5-sorryPendingActivitiesSavePartially.gif)
      
      ( screencast of editing a document to change ids and several other
      properties - after clicking save, we can see that changing id is refused
      because there is pending activities. Other properties that where changes
      at the same times are not all modified, which breaks the
      transactionality we can usally expect when editing documents in ERP5 )
      
      The changed here is to use a field validator that refused editing when there are pending activities, so that user gets a:
      
      ![erp5-pending-activiities](/uploads/bfe825560bdee34f0443e8e36884f21c/erp5-pending-activiities.png)
      
      ( screenshot of the change: now edition is rejected )
      
      and the result is either all changes are applied or no change is applied at all.
      
      This is done by:
       * introducing a new `my_view_mode_id` field in `erp5_core`'s `Base_viewFieldLibrary`
       * using this field as proxy field of all editable `my_id` fields. Maybe I forgot some business templates, I changed only the most common ones. I intentionally did not change all fields of `erp5_ui_test` because I think they are used to compare speed of proxy fields vs traditional fields.
      
      0352f50fd543fda2712bb8ca93d8a8814f975a26 introduces a Zelenium test exercising this new behavior.
      
      /reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!504
      
      Conflicts:
      	product/ERP5/bootstrap/erp5_core/SkinTemplateItem/portal_skins/erp5_core/Base_viewFieldLibrary.xml
      16de28d5
    • Jérome Perrin's avatar
      Merge !535 Generate a new source reference after cloning a payment transaction group · 6e09ff13
      Jérome Perrin authored
      This is a fix for this issue:
      
      Create a payment transaction group, a source reference will be generated (something like `PTG0123`. The field is read only on the form, so it's clearly not something we expect user to edit, but a kind of unique generated reference.
      
      Clone that payment transaction group, on the cloned payment transaction group, source reference is empty.
      
      The fix here is to generate a new source reference.
      
      A side effect of these changes is that destination reference is no longer reset after clone, because before this `Delivery_afterClone` was used and this script reset both source and destination reference.
      
      /reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!535
      6e09ff13
    • Jérome Perrin's avatar
      Merge !534 Do not suggest bad practices in new test component template · 4bacaa20
      Jérome Perrin authored
      Numbering tests can be used to control test execution order, but developers should write independent tests that should not rely on test execution order.
      
      `getTitle` is useless. Test runner will print the class name.
      
      /reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!534
      4bacaa20