Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
A
Acquisition
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
Analytics
Analytics
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Kirill Smelkov
Acquisition
Commits
a47f7a52
Commit
a47f7a52
authored
Oct 29, 2009
by
Andreas Zeidler
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
backport fix for LP #360761 (r105349:105351) to Zope 2.10
parent
7a0b03b7
Changes
2
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
with
82 additions
and
3 deletions
+82
-3
_Acquisition.c
_Acquisition.c
+26
-1
tests.py
tests.py
+56
-2
No files found.
_Acquisition.c
View file @
a47f7a52
...
...
@@ -819,10 +819,35 @@ Wrapper_contains(Wrapper *self, PyObject *v)
return
c
;
}
/* Support for iteration cannot rely on the internal implementation of
`PyObject_GetIter`, since the `self` passed into `__iter__` and
`__getitem__` should be acquisition-wrapped (also see LP 360761): The
wrapper obviously supports the iterator protocol so simply calling
`PyObject_GetIter(OBJECT(self))` results in an infinite recursion.
Instead the base object needs to be checked and the wrapper must only
be used when actually calling `__getitem__` or setting up a sequence
iterator. */
static
PyObject
*
Wrapper_iter
(
Wrapper
*
self
)
{
return
PyObject_GetIter
(
self
->
obj
);
PyObject
*
obj
=
self
->
obj
;
PyObject
*
res
;
if
((
res
=
PyObject_GetAttr
(
OBJECT
(
self
),
py__iter__
)))
{
ASSIGN
(
res
,
PyObject_CallFunction
(
res
,
NULL
,
NULL
));
if
(
res
!=
NULL
&&
!
PyIter_Check
(
res
))
{
PyErr_Format
(
PyExc_TypeError
,
"iter() returned non-iterator "
"of type '%.100s'"
,
res
->
ob_type
->
tp_name
);
Py_DECREF
(
res
);
res
=
NULL
;
}
}
else
if
(
PySequence_Check
(
obj
))
{
ASSIGN
(
res
,
PySeqIter_New
(
OBJECT
(
self
)));
}
else
{
res
=
PyErr_Format
(
PyExc_TypeError
,
"iteration over non-sequence"
);
}
return
res
;
}
static
PySequenceMethods
Wrapper_as_sequence
=
{
...
...
tests.py
View file @
a47f7a52
...
...
@@ -1719,8 +1719,9 @@ def test_proxying():
iterating...
[42]
Finally let's check that https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/360761
has been fixed:
Next let's check that the wrapper's __iter__ proxy falls back
to using the object's __getitem__ if it has no __iter__. See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/360761 .
>>> class C(Acquisition.Implicit):
... l=[1,2,3]
...
...
@@ -1739,6 +1740,59 @@ def test_proxying():
>>> list(c2)
[1, 2, 3]
The __iter__proxy should also pass the wrapped object as self to
the __iter__ of objects defining __iter__::
>>> class C(Acquisition.Implicit):
... def __iter__(self):
... print 'iterating...'
... for i in range(5):
... yield i, self.aq_parent.name
>>> c = C()
>>> i = Impl()
>>> i.c = c
>>> i.name = 'i'
>>> list(i.c)
iterating...
[(0, 'i'), (1, 'i'), (2, 'i'), (3, 'i'), (4, 'i')]
And it should pass the wrapped object as self to
the __getitem__ of objects without an __iter__::
>>> class C(Acquisition.Implicit):
... def __getitem__(self, i):
... return self.aq_parent.l[i]
>>> c = C()
>>> i = Impl()
>>> i.c = c
>>> i.l = range(5)
>>> list(i.c)
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
Finally let's make sure errors are still correctly raised after having
to use a modified version of `PyObject_GetIter` for iterator support::
>>> class C(Acquisition.Implicit):
... pass
>>> c = C()
>>> i = Impl()
>>> i.c = c
>>> list(i.c)
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: iteration over non-sequence
>>> class C(Acquisition.Implicit):
... def __iter__(self):
... return [42]
>>> c = C()
>>> i = Impl()
>>> i.c = c
>>> list(i.c)
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: iter() returned non-iterator of type 'list'
"""
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment