Commit a47f7a52 authored by Andreas Zeidler's avatar Andreas Zeidler

backport fix for LP #360761 (r105349:105351) to Zope 2.10

parent 7a0b03b7
...@@ -819,10 +819,35 @@ Wrapper_contains(Wrapper *self, PyObject *v) ...@@ -819,10 +819,35 @@ Wrapper_contains(Wrapper *self, PyObject *v)
return c; return c;
} }
/* Support for iteration cannot rely on the internal implementation of
`PyObject_GetIter`, since the `self` passed into `__iter__` and
`__getitem__` should be acquisition-wrapped (also see LP 360761): The
wrapper obviously supports the iterator protocol so simply calling
`PyObject_GetIter(OBJECT(self))` results in an infinite recursion.
Instead the base object needs to be checked and the wrapper must only
be used when actually calling `__getitem__` or setting up a sequence
iterator. */
static PyObject * static PyObject *
Wrapper_iter(Wrapper *self) Wrapper_iter(Wrapper *self)
{ {
return PyObject_GetIter(self->obj); PyObject *obj = self->obj;
PyObject *res;
if ((res=PyObject_GetAttr(OBJECT(self),py__iter__))) {
ASSIGN(res,PyObject_CallFunction(res,NULL,NULL));
if (res != NULL && !PyIter_Check(res)) {
PyErr_Format(PyExc_TypeError,
"iter() returned non-iterator "
"of type '%.100s'",
res->ob_type->tp_name);
Py_DECREF(res);
res = NULL;
}
} else if (PySequence_Check(obj)) {
ASSIGN(res,PySeqIter_New(OBJECT(self)));
} else {
res = PyErr_Format(PyExc_TypeError, "iteration over non-sequence");
}
return res;
} }
static PySequenceMethods Wrapper_as_sequence = { static PySequenceMethods Wrapper_as_sequence = {
......
...@@ -1719,8 +1719,9 @@ def test_proxying(): ...@@ -1719,8 +1719,9 @@ def test_proxying():
iterating... iterating...
[42] [42]
Finally let's check that https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/360761 Next let's check that the wrapper's __iter__ proxy falls back
has been fixed: to using the object's __getitem__ if it has no __iter__. See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/360761 .
>>> class C(Acquisition.Implicit): >>> class C(Acquisition.Implicit):
... l=[1,2,3] ... l=[1,2,3]
...@@ -1739,6 +1740,59 @@ def test_proxying(): ...@@ -1739,6 +1740,59 @@ def test_proxying():
>>> list(c2) >>> list(c2)
[1, 2, 3] [1, 2, 3]
The __iter__proxy should also pass the wrapped object as self to
the __iter__ of objects defining __iter__::
>>> class C(Acquisition.Implicit):
... def __iter__(self):
... print 'iterating...'
... for i in range(5):
... yield i, self.aq_parent.name
>>> c = C()
>>> i = Impl()
>>> i.c = c
>>> i.name = 'i'
>>> list(i.c)
iterating...
[(0, 'i'), (1, 'i'), (2, 'i'), (3, 'i'), (4, 'i')]
And it should pass the wrapped object as self to
the __getitem__ of objects without an __iter__::
>>> class C(Acquisition.Implicit):
... def __getitem__(self, i):
... return self.aq_parent.l[i]
>>> c = C()
>>> i = Impl()
>>> i.c = c
>>> i.l = range(5)
>>> list(i.c)
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
Finally let's make sure errors are still correctly raised after having
to use a modified version of `PyObject_GetIter` for iterator support::
>>> class C(Acquisition.Implicit):
... pass
>>> c = C()
>>> i = Impl()
>>> i.c = c
>>> list(i.c)
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: iteration over non-sequence
>>> class C(Acquisition.Implicit):
... def __iter__(self):
... return [42]
>>> c = C()
>>> i = Impl()
>>> i.c = c
>>> list(i.c)
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: iter() returned non-iterator of type 'list'
""" """
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment