Commit 7f22495b authored by yonghong-song's avatar yonghong-song Committed by GitHub

Merge pull request #1692 from palmtenor/stack_flag

Refactor offcputime stack id error handling
parents 9d1bdaa5 ea72805b
......@@ -35,6 +35,11 @@ def positive_nonzero_int(val):
raise argparse.ArgumentTypeError("must be nonzero")
return ival
def stack_id_err(stack_id):
# -EFAULT in get_stackid normally means the stack-trace is not availible,
# Such as getting kernel stack trace in userspace code
return (stack_id < 0) and (stack_id != -errno.EFAULT)
# arguments
examples = """examples:
./offcputime # trace off-CPU stack time until Ctrl-C
......@@ -199,9 +204,8 @@ bpf_text = bpf_text.replace('MINBLOCK_US_VALUE', str(args.min_block_time))
bpf_text = bpf_text.replace('MAXBLOCK_US_VALUE', str(args.max_block_time))
# handle stack args
kernel_stack_get = "stack_traces.get_stackid(ctx, BPF_F_REUSE_STACKID)"
user_stack_get = \
"stack_traces.get_stackid(ctx, BPF_F_REUSE_STACKID | BPF_F_USER_STACK)"
kernel_stack_get = "stack_traces.get_stackid(ctx, 0)"
user_stack_get = "stack_traces.get_stackid(ctx, BPF_F_USER_STACK)"
stack_context = ""
if args.user_stacks_only:
stack_context = "user"
......@@ -260,16 +264,13 @@ has_enomem = False
counts = b.get_table("counts")
stack_traces = b.get_table("stack_traces")
for k, v in sorted(counts.items(), key=lambda counts: counts[1].value):
# handle get_stackid erorrs
if (not args.user_stacks_only and k.kernel_stack_id < 0) or \
(not args.kernel_stacks_only and k.user_stack_id < 0 and
k.user_stack_id != -errno.EFAULT):
# handle get_stackid errors
if not args.user_stacks_only and stack_id_err(k.kernel_stack_id):
missing_stacks += 1
has_enomem = has_enomem or k.kernel_stack_id == -errno.ENOMEM
if not args.kernel_stacks_only and stack_id_err(k.user_stack_id):
missing_stacks += 1
# check for an ENOMEM error
if k.kernel_stack_id == -errno.ENOMEM or \
k.user_stack_id == -errno.ENOMEM:
has_enomem = True
continue
has_enomem = has_enomem or k.user_stack_id == -errno.ENOMEM
# user stacks will be symbolized by tgid, not pid, to avoid the overhead
# of one symbol resolver per thread
......@@ -282,25 +283,43 @@ for k, v in sorted(counts.items(), key=lambda counts: counts[1].value):
# print folded stack output
user_stack = list(user_stack)
kernel_stack = list(kernel_stack)
line = [k.name.decode()] + \
[b.sym(addr, k.tgid) for addr in reversed(user_stack)] + \
(need_delimiter and ["-"] or []) + \
[b.ksym(addr) for addr in reversed(kernel_stack)]
line = [k.name.decode()]
# if we failed to get the stack is, such as due to no space (-ENOMEM) or
# hash collision (-EEXIST), we still print a placeholder for consistency
if not args.kernel_stacks_only:
if stack_id_err(k.user_stack_id):
line.append("[Missed User Stack]")
else:
line.extend([b.sym(addr, k.tgid) for addr in reversed(user_stack)])
if not args.user_stacks_only:
line.extend(["-"] if (need_delimiter and k.kernel_stack_id >= 0) else [])
if stack_id_err(k.kernel_stack_id):
line.append("[Missed Kernel Stack]")
else:
line.extend([b.ksym(addr) for addr in reversed(kernel_stack)])
print("%s %d" % (";".join(line), v.value))
else:
# print default multi-line stack output
for addr in kernel_stack:
print(" %s" % b.ksym(addr))
if need_delimiter:
print(" --")
for addr in user_stack:
print(" %s" % b.sym(addr, k.tgid))
if not args.user_stacks_only:
if stack_id_err(k.kernel_stack_id):
print(" [Missed Kernel Stack]")
else:
for addr in kernel_stack:
print(" %s" % b.ksym(addr))
if not args.kernel_stacks_only:
if need_delimiter and k.user_stack_id >= 0:
print(" --")
if stack_id_err(k.user_stack_id):
print(" [Missed User Stack]")
else:
for addr in user_stack:
print(" %s" % b.sym(addr, k.tgid))
print(" %-16s %s (%d)" % ("-", k.name.decode(), k.pid))
print(" %d\n" % v.value)
if missing_stacks > 0:
enomem_str = "" if not has_enomem else \
" Consider increasing --stack-storage-size."
print("WARNING: %d stack traces could not be displayed.%s" %
print("WARNING: %d stack traces lost and could not be displayed.%s" %
(missing_stacks, enomem_str),
file=stderr)
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment