- 13 Jun, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
Same story as in e.g. kirr/wendelin.core@b0b2c52e ( in short: GitLab now prepends namespace/repo/blob/ref/ prefix by itself )
-
- 02 May, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
No need to compute that twice. My mistake from original 6f237f22 (git-backup: Initial draft).
-
- 13 Apr, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
README.txt was renamed -> README.rst in a695bdbe (readme: .txt -> .rst)
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
Add a short introduction which outlines what gitlab-backup program does.
-
- 29 Feb, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
Following up on 48062989 (gitlab-backup/restore: Gitlab wants uploads/ to be 0750 and dirs inside uploads/ to be 0755): Starting from 8.5: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/4f946f03 GitLab wants uploads/ to be 0700 and dirs inside uploads/ to be 0700 too.
-
- 28 Feb, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
ln has several syntaxes. man ln 1 ln: SYNOPSIS ln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME (1st form) ln [OPTION]... TARGET (2nd form) ln [OPTION]... TARGET... DIRECTORY (3rd form) ln [OPTION]... -t DIRECTORY TARGET... (4th form) so without -T or -t what is target and what is link name is ambiguous and ln tries to guess. Now imagine: ln -sf /path/to/new/hook $H and let us consider that $H is already a symlink, pointing to some place which _exists_, but current user do not have access to. Then ln will complain: ln: accessing `$H': Permission denied and abort. Fix it by specifying ln form we use explicitly with -T.
-
- 10 Feb, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
On restore we were initializing refs/ and objects/ for repositories obtained from backuped refs set, but this approach does not cover empty repositories - e.g. repositories without any ref at all. A frequent case for this is *.wiki.git in gitlab, and if we restore only files for such repo, without empty refs/ and objects/ it would look like restored ok, but any git-related operation on such repo will fail. Fix it via making sure to create refs/ and objects/ the first time we see a *.git while restoring files. /cc @kazuhiko
-
- 09 Feb, 2016 9 commits
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
Add comments about what each function does, and add appropriate echo which were missing in several pull & restore places.
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
- don't start/stop services - we assume appropriate services start/stop will be done bu invoker, and tell people to do so via dumping proper comments. (Rationale: services are start/stopped differently on different systems, e.g. in omnibus and in slapos) - mv in repositories atomically with just 1 mv + fix case when there was no repositories/ previously at all. - adjust `gitlab-rake gitlab:backup:restore` with force=yes, so it does not interactively ask about whether ok to restore ssh keys - just do it. - add `-go` option to actually run gitlab restoration in addition to preparing backup files. /cc @kazuhiko
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
Currently GitLab backup restoration works on exactly the same GitLab version, as the one with which the backup was made: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/7383453b/lib/backup/manager.rb#L132 However in many cases restoring backup on a newer GitLab version is desirable - e.g. when moving GitLab instance to upgraded software. GitLab answer - that we should first prepare exactly the same GitLab version on moved instance, restore backup, then upgrade GitLab itself _inplace_, is not satisfactory in e.g. slapos case - as upgrading can take a long time, and in-place software changes can render GitLab instance non-working. What we better prefer to do is to fully prepare new GitLab software version, and then knowing software is ready, restore backup in a quick manner. The following analysis says we should be 99% ok to do so: 1. git-backup cares backward compatibility for format of repositories backup. 2. db dump is backward compatible, because Rails, when seeing old db schema, will run migrations. 3. the rest is relatively minor - e.g. uploads, which is just files in tar, and format for such things changes seldomly. because of 3, strictly speaking, it is not 100% correct to restore backup from older gitlab version to newer one (since gitlab does not provide a promise of backward compatibility on e.g. uploads/ backup format) , but in practice it is 99% correct and is usually handy. /cc @kazuhiko
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
As with repositories (see patch "gitlab-backup/restore: GitLab wants repositories to be drwxrws---") Gitlab wants proper permissions for uploads/ - else the following check fail Uploads directory setup correctly? ... no Try fixing it: sudo chmod 0750 .../var/gitlab/uploads For more information see: doc/install/installation.md in section "GitLab" Please fix the error above and rerun the checks. Uploads directory setup correctly? ... no Try fixing it: sudo chown -R slapuser14 .../var/gitlab/uploads sudo find .../var/gitlab/uploads -type f -exec chmod 0644 {} \; sudo find .../var/gitlab/uploads -type d -not -path .../var/gitlab/uploads -exec chmod 0755 {} \; and files are not served back from uploads - e.g. there is no uploaded icons shown. /cc @kazuhiko
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
By design Gitlab currently symlinks *.git/hooks to hooks in gitlab-shell working tree. As when restoring backup on different machine gitlab-shell worktree can be located in another place, all hooks needs to be adjusted upon restoration. Btw, Gitlab itself does the same: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/7383453b/lib/backup/repository.rb#L103 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/1d03fa2e /cc @kazuhiko
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
As git-backup does not currently preserve file persmissions fully, we need to adjust them on restore. For repositories after restore the following gitlab check currently fails: Repo base access is drwxrws---? ... no Fix it. /cc @kazuhiko
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
As was outlined 2 patches before (gitlab-backup: Dump DB ourselves), currently DB dump is not git friendly, because for each table dump is just one (potentially large) file and grows over time. In Gitlab there is one big table which dominates ~95% of whole dump size. So to avoid overloading git with large blobs, let's split each table to parts <= 16M in size, so this way we do not store very large blobs in git, with which it is inefficient. The fact that table data is sorted (see previous patch) helps the splitting result to be more-or-less stable - as we split not purely by byte size, but by lines, and max size 16M is only approximate, if a row is changed in a part, it will be splitted the same way on the next backup run. This works not so good, when row entries are large itself (e.g. for big patches which change a lot of files with big diff). For such cases splitting can be improved with splitting by edges found similar to e.g. bup[1] - by finding nodes of a rolling checksum, but for now we are staying with more simple way of doing the split. This reduce load on git packing (for e.g. repack or when doing fetch and push) a lot. [1] https://github.com/bup/bup /cc @kazuhiko
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
As was outlined in previous patch, DB dump is currently not git/rsync friendly because order of rows in PostgreSQL dump constantly changes: pg_dump dumps table data with `COPY ... TO stdout` which does not guaranty any ordering - http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c;h=aa01d6a6;hb=HEAD#l1590 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24622579/does-or-can-the-postgresql-copy-to-command-guarantee-a-particular-row-order - in fact it dumps data as stored raw in DB pages, and every record update changes row order. On the other hand, Rails by default adds integer `id` first column to every table as convention - http://edgeguides.rubyonrails.org/active_record_basics.html and GitLab does not override this. So we can sort tables on id and this way make data order stable. And even if there is no id column we can sort - as COPY does not guarantee ordering, we can change the order of rows in _whatever_ way and the dump will still be correct. This change helps git a lot to find good object deltas in less time, and it should also help rsync to find less delta between backup dumps. NOTE no changes are needed on restore side at all - the dump stays valid - sorted or not, and restores to semantically the same DB, even if internal rows ordering is different. /cc @kazuhiko
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
The reason to do this is that we want to have more control over DB dump process. Current problems which lead to this decision are: 1. DB dump is one large file which size grows over time. This is not friendly to git; 2. DB dump is currently not git/rsync friendly - when PostgreSQL does a dump, it just copes internal pages for data to output. And internal ordering changes every time a row is updated. http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c;h=aa01d6a6;hb=HEAD#l1590 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24622579/does-or-can-the-postgresql-copy-to-command-guarantee-a-particular-row-order both 1 and 2 currently put our backup tool to their knees. We'll be handling those issues in the following patches. For now we perform the dump manually and switch from dumping in plain-text SQL to dumping in PostgreSQL native "directory" format, where there is small table of contents with schema (toc.dat) and output of `COPY <table> TO stdout` for each table in separate file. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/app-pgdump.html On restore we restore plain-text SQL with pg_restore and give this plain-text SQL back to gitlab, so it thinks it restores it the usual way. NOTE: backward compatibility is preserved - restore part, if it sees backup made by older version of gitlab-backup, which dumps database.sql in plain text - restores it correctly. NOTE2: now gitlab-backup supports only PostgreSQL (e.g. not MySQL). Adding support for other databases is possible, but requires custom handler for every DB (or just a fallback to usual plaintext maybe). NOTE3: even as we split DB into separate tables, this does not currently help problem #1, as in GitLab it is mostly just one table which occupies the whole space. /cc @kazuhiko
-
- 08 Feb, 2016 5 commits
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
For now having $tmpd worked ok, but in the next patch, we are going to pass this directory to a command, which, when run, automatically changes its working directory as a first step, so passing $tmpd as relative pathname won't work for it. So switch $tmpd to be an absolute path. /cc @kazuhiko
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
In the following patches we will be adding more and more settings to read from gitlab config, so structure of code which does this is better prepared: - part that emits the settings (in Ruby) is now multiline - we prepare shortcuts c & s which are Gitlab.config and Gitlab.config.gitlab_shell - in the end there is "END" emitted, and the reader checks this to make sure generate and read parts stay in sync. /cc @kazuhiko
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
It works ok without it: ---- 8< ---- z.sh #!/bin/bash -e { read A read B } < <(echo -e 'AAA\nBBB') echo $A echo $B ---- 8< ---- $ ./z.sh AAA BBB $ echo $? 0 /cc @kazuhiko
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
In 495bd2fa (gitlab-backup: Unpack *.tar.gz before storing them in git) we used find(1) to find *.tar.gz and unpack/repack them on backup/restore. However `find -exec ...` does not stop on errors and does not report them. Compare: ---- 8< ---- x.sh #!/bin/bash -e echo AAA find . -exec false ';' echo BBB ---- 8< ---- ---- 8< ---- y.sh #!/bin/bash -e echo XXX find . | \ while read F; do false done echo YYY ---- 8< ---- $ ./x.sh AAA BBB $ echo $? 0 $ ./y.sh XXX $ echo $? 1 So we switch to second style where find passes entries to processing program via channel. This second new style is also more clean, in my view, because listing and processing parts are now more better structured. /cc @kazuhiko
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
- 30 Dec, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
Starting from 8.2 GitLab backups uploads and other directories not just as set of files, but as one tarball: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/d3734fbd and this does not play well with git - now objects are stored as a one big whole, compressed, so git cannot find good deltas. So to help git properly deltify and find duplicates, let's unpack/repack the archives, the same way we already do for database.sql.gz
-
- 14 Oct, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
Since objects are shared between backed up repositories, it is important to make sure we do not pull a broken object once, thus programming future corruption of that object after restore in all repositories which use it. Object corruption could happen for two reasons: - plain storage corruption, or - someone intentionally pushing corrupted object with known sha1 to any repository. Second case is even more dangerous, as it potentially allows attacker to change data in not-available-to-him repositories. Now objects are checked on pull, and if corrupt, git-backup complains, e.g. this way: RuntimeError: git -c fetch.fsckObjects=true fetch --no-tags ../D/corrupt.git refs/*:refs/backup/20151014-1914/aaa/corrupt.git/* error: inflate: data stream error (incorrect data check) fatal: loose object 52baccfe8479b61c2a0d5447bc0a6bf7c6827c60 (stored in ./objects/52/baccfe8479b61c2a0d5447bc0a6bf7c6827c60) is corrupt fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
-
- 24 Sep, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
- 22 Sep, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
Current hostings don't recognize .txt as being reStructuredText, so let's be explicit, so readme gets automatically rendered.
-
- 08 Sep, 2015 2 commits
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
os.walk() yields symlinks to directories in dirnames and do not follow them. Our backup cycle expects all files that need to go to blob to be in filenames and that dirnames are only recursed-into by walk(). Thus, until now, symlink to a directory was simply ignored and not backup'ed. In particular *.git/hooks are usually symlinks to common place. The fix is to adjust our xwalk() to always represent blob-ish things in filenames, and leave dirnames only for real directories. /cc @kazuhiko
-
- 31 Aug, 2015 3 commits
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
This is convenience program to pull/restore backup data for a GitLab instance into/from git-backup managed repository. Backup layout is: gitlab/misc - db + uploads + ... gitlab/repo - git repositories On restoration we extract repositories into .../git-data/repositories.<timestamp> and db backup into standard gitlab backup tar and advice user how to proceed with exact finishing commands. This will hopefully be improved and changed to finish automatically, after some testing.
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
This program backups files and set of bare Git repositories into one Git repository. Files are copied to blobs and then added to tree under certain place, and for Git repositories, all reachable objects are pulled in with maintaining index which remembers reference -> sha1 for every pulled repositories. After objects from backuped Git repositories are pulled in, we create new commit which references tree with changed backup index and files, and also has all head objects from pulled-in repositories in its parents(*). This way backup has history and all pulled objects become reachable from single head commit in backup repository. In particular that means that the whole state of backup can be described with only single sha1, and that backup repository itself could be synchronized via standard git pull/push, be repacked, etc. Restoration process is the opposite - from a particular backup state, files are extracted at a proper place, and for Git repositories a pack with all objects reachable from that repository heads is prepared and extracted from backup repository object database. This approach allows to leverage Git's good ability for object contents deduplication and packing, especially for cases when there are many hosted repositories which are forks of each other with relatively minor changes in between each other and over time, and mostly common base. In author experience the size of backup is dramatically smaller compared to straightforward "let's tar it all" approach. Data for all backuped files and repositories can be accessed if one has access to backup repository, so either they all should be in the same security domain, or extra care has to be taken to protect access to backup repository. File permissions are not managed with strict details due to inherent nature of Git. This aspect can be improved with e.g. etckeeper-like (http://etckeeper.branchable.com/) approach if needed. Please see README.txt with user-level overview on how to use git-backup. NOTE the idea of pulling all refs together is similar to git-namespaces http://git-scm.com/docs/gitnamespaces (*) Tag objects are handled specially - because in a lot of places Git insists and assumes commit parents can only be commit objects. We encode tag objects in specially-crafted commit object on pull, and decode back on backup restore. We do likewise if a ref points to tree or blob, which is valid in Git.
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
The project to implement backing up repositories on git hosting efficiently.
-