Skip to content

L
linux
Switch branch/tag
  1. 19 Oct, 2021 4 commits
    • Daniel Latypov's avatar
      kunit: tool: misc fixes (unused vars, imports, leaked files) · a54ea2e0
      Daniel Latypov authored 
      Drop some variables in unit tests that were unused and/or add assertions
based on them.

For ExitStack, it was imported, but the `es` variable wasn't used so it
didn't do anything, and we were leaking the file objects.
Refactor it to just use nested `with` statements to properly close them.

And drop the direct use of .close() on file objects in the kunit tool
unit test, as these can be leaked if test assertions fail.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBrendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarShuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
      a54ea2e0
    • Daniel Latypov's avatar
      kunit: fix too small allocation when using suite-only kunit.filter_glob · cd94fbc2
      Daniel Latypov authored 
      When a user filters by a suite and not a test, e.g.
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run 'suite_name'

it hits this code
  const int len = strlen(filter_glob);
  ...
  parsed->suite_glob = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
which fails to allocate space for the terminating NULL.

Somehow, it seems like we can't easily reproduce this under UML, so the
existing `parse_filter_test()` didn't catch this.

Fix this by allocating `len + 1` and switch to kzalloc() just to be a
bit more defensive. We're only going to run this code once per kernel
boot, and it should never be very long.

Also update the unit tests to be a bit more cautious.
This bug showed up as a NULL pointer dereference here:
>  KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, (const char *)filtered.start[0][0]->name, "suite0");
`filtered.start[0][0]` was NULL, and `name` is at offset 0 in the struct,
so `...->name` was also NULL.

Fixes: 3b29021ddd10 ("kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob")
Reported-by: default avatarkernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: default avatarBrendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarShuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
      cd94fbc2
    • Daniel Latypov's avatar
      kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob · a127b154
      Daniel Latypov authored 
      Commit 1d71307a ("kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by
names") introduced the ability to filter which suites we run via glob.

This change extends it so we can also filter individual test cases
inside of suites as well.

This is quite useful when, e.g.
* trying to run just the tests cases you've just added or are working on
* trying to debug issues with test hermeticity

Examples:
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*exec*.parse*'
...
============================================================
======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ========
[PASSED] parse_filter_test
============================================================
Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.

$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*.no_matching_tests'
...
[ERROR] no tests run!
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBrendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarShuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
      a127b154
    • Daniel Latypov's avatar
      kunit: drop assumption in kunit-log-test about current suite · b7cbaef3
      Daniel Latypov authored 
      This test assumes that the declared kunit_suite object is the exact one
which is being executed, which KUnit will not guarantee [1].

Specifically, `suite->log` is not initialized until a suite object is
executed. So if KUnit makes a copy of the suite and runs that instead,
this test dereferences an invalid pointer and (hopefully) segfaults.

N.B. since we no longer assume this, we can no longer verify that
`suite->log` is *not* allocated during normal execution.

An alternative to this patch that would allow us to test that would
require exposing an API for the current test to get its current suite.
Exposing that for one internal kunit test seems like overkill, and
grants users more footguns (e.g. reusing a test case in multiple suites
and changing behavior based on the suite name, dynamically modifying the
setup/cleanup funcs, storing/reading stuff out of the suite->log, etc.).

[1] In a subsequent patch, KUnit will allow running subsets of test
cases within a suite by making a copy of the suite w/ the filtered test
list. But there are other reasons KUnit might execute a copy, e.g. if it
ever wants to support parallel execution of different suites, recovering
from errors and restarting suites
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBrendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarShuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
      b7cbaef3
  3. 18 Oct, 2021 17 commits
  5. 17 Oct, 2021 3 commits
  7. 16 Oct, 2021 16 commits
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7